.
Other channels:  Performance Retailing Commercial Suppliers Technology Auto Service

Wholesale / Distributing

Article

Text size: Normal Text Size Large Text Size
December 17, 2010

'Good, better, best' is dead!

What size proliferation had done to inventories

By: Wayne WIliams

Thirty years have brought a lot of changes, a lot of choices, a lot of complexity, and it’s moving towards chaos.

We’ve come a long way since 1980. It doesn’t seem that long ago, but I remember selling tires at the retail sales counter and it went something like this: “Mrs. Smith, I have three tires to choose from today.  I have a 40,000-mile tire for $40, a 50,000-mile tire for $50, and our best tire is a 65,000-mile tire for $65!”

Usually, all of these tires came from a single supplier, either factory direct or from our local distributor. When we sold them, we reordered them; simple. Even if we were out of stock on the $40 tire, at least we had the $50 tire to sell. Back then many vehicle manufactures used the same size tires. Most cars were built in Detroit, the Big Three they were called; GM, Ford, and Chrysler. A 195/75R14 fit a lot of cars.

Sometimes our supplier was back-ordered on the $40 tire because they were updating the mold, or moving the mold, or fixing the mold, all to “improve” the supply at some “promised” later date. Sometimes the supplier would offer the $50 tire at a discount until supply improved on the $40 tire. Usually, the supply improved in a relatively reasonable amount of time, and we continued to sell tires in the “good, better, best” format.

In 1980, the “magic” number was 102. That 102 represented the number of SKUs required to have 80% coverage for the types of vehicles on the road. 1990 rolled around and the “magic” number more than doubled to 211. And finally, the new millennium hit, along with 140 more SKUs, bringing the total “magic” number to 352! Well, I don’t have to tell you that the changes and the choices have added complexity to SKU inventory management!

I’m a car guy. My dad worked for GM for 42 years. He started on the assembly line, fitting bumpers on ’54 Buicks, and retired a plant manager. Cars are in my blood. It used to be Chevys and Fords, but now brands are coming from every corner of the globe with names and numbers, like A4s and Z4s, with every conceivable size tire with special compounds, vehicle-unique sizes, vehicle-unique tread patterns, staggered fitments, run-flats, etc. These changes have added immensely to the complexity at the retail sales counter.

We can no longer say to Mrs. Smith, “I have three options to choose from in stock today.” Nor can we say, “Mrs. Smith, I have several options for your staggered fitment Mercedes SL Class, sizes 255/40R18F and 285/35R18R.” Instead, the sales staff utters these famous words that are becoming more and more common every day: “I don’t have your size, but I can get ‘em.”  They say this with confidence, but in their minds they are not so sure! The question becomes: “Where and when?”

« Previous  |  1  2  |  Next »

Share this:  Share on Facebook Share on Twitter

Request more info about this product / service / company

comments

  1. Angelo | January 10, 2011 at 04:25PM
    I remember the Good, Better, Best and I'm gonna say the %'s were 5% sold, 25% sold and 70% sold as Best..and I never missed a Road Hazard on any of those sales...ahhh those were the days...

  2. Harry | January 27, 2011 at 08:19AM
    Wayne, I have to disagree with your statement that "Good, Better, Best, is Dead". Quite the contrary at this time in our economy than ever.

    Customers more than ever need to know "where is the middle" in purchasing tires simply because they are either keeping their car longer and need tires, and related services, that may keep that present vehicle going for another 30, 40, or 50K till they can purchase a replacement new (or lower mileage used) vehicle, should they ever get the opportunity (in other words the "cash" from their budget or a job!).

    Your article misrepresents (in my opinion) a key marketing strategy to the independent tire dealer, that is (to this day) a viable marketing tool.

    "GOOD, BETTER, BEST" strategy defines the middle to the prospective buyer, no matter WHAT you are selling!

    You forget to "educate" the tire retailer that the age problem in this industry, and one that has created this "nightmare" for tire availability is the "Greed Factor" that has forced Major Brand suppliers to seek out other sources to sell their products (ie.: Auto Dealers) that would gladly sell a "major brand" over a "private brand" at a "decent profit margin" (and I am NOT speaking about %'s only here either!)

    I have over 35 years of successful "retailing" experience with "Mom and Pop's" to Major Chain tire retailers, and I am here to tell you first hand that it DID work in the past and IS working today... successfully!

    Most of the "guilt" of this current situation for the independent tire dealers is a lack of training of the basic "key elements" that it takes to sell tires... "profitably"! That is done by "UNCHAINING" the salespeople from the counters and going "OUT TO THE CAR!" to make an intelligent recommendation to the customer based on "agreeable facts" that both parties can see, and talk about, to make an intelligent buying decision!

    The lack of training (real world training), "greed" on both sides of the table, and "laziness" has caused this s

  3. Mike | September 14, 2012 at 02:52PM
    I concur with Harry. Best, Better, Good is ALIVE and well!!! Only when consumers stop wanting choices will it be dead....

Post a Comment

First Name:
  Last Name:
Email:
Comment:

Recent News

eNews

Hotwire

Receive the latest MTD eNews in your inbox!

Signup Sign up for our Enews and receive the latest news, trends, and product information right in your e-mail inbox. Join Today!

View the latest eNews:
Monday Edition  |  Thursday Edition  |  CTD Online  |  Auto Service

Be Informed : Stay Current
Free Weekly Hotwire E-News
Subscribe Today!