TIA: Free trade, open markets best for U.S., China

Sept. 27, 2012

After three years, the U.S. trade tariff on tires imported from China expired at midnight Sept. 26, 2012, as expected.

The Tire Industry Association (TIA) says the duties or “safeguards” were established by President Obama’s administration to combat what the Department of Commerce found was Chinese tire manufacturers receiving subsidies ranging from 10.90% to 30.69%.

According to the Peterson Institute for International Economics, 1,200 American jobs were saved as a result of the Chinese tire tariffs. However, that tariff mostly benefited other tire exporting countries first and American manufacturers second on the low-cost tires. 

At the time of the imposition of these duties in 2009, TIA Executive Vice President Roy Littlefield said, “The tire manufacturers made the decision years ago to shift production of these lower-cost tires out of the U.S. All this action will do is force the tire manufacturers to shift production of these lower-cost tires to other countries.”

TIA says this is exactly what happened.

Recently, the Obama administration, in its continuing effort to establish a “level playing field,” requested from the World Trade Organization (WTO) “dispute settlement consultations with the People’s Republic of China on auto and auto parts producers.” 

The specific mainland Chinese manufacturers are located in what are called “export bases,” and according to the administration’s newly created Interagency Trade Enforcement Center, these companies received one billion dollars in subsidies between 2009 and 2011. The information was calculated from publicly obtained documents and are a clear violation of the WTO agreement according to Ron Kirk, the U.S. trade representative.

The full U.S. Trade Representative office’s WTO filing can be found by clicking here. The U.S. Customs office guidance for the original tariff can be found here.

TIA’s position is that free and open markets with level playing fields are best for the consuming public and the local tire dealership in providing the best price for the best product possible. The 22-page submittal to the WTO does not specifically mention tires, but does address many related automotive aftermarket products. 

Although this differs from the Chinese tire tariff of 2009, it is a continuation of the on-going efforts of integrating China into the world market. This is happening by the fact that China is using the WTO to resolve disputes between itself and the U.S.

TIA says the Chinese have submitted a countersuit to the WTO because of the Administration’s actions. Littlefield said that, “It is good that the Chinese government is using the WTO, it is the proper mechanism for resolving such disagreements and they are establishing a good track record of complying with the WTO’s findings.”

For more on the Chinese tire tariff, see:

Candidate uses tire tariff as campaign fodder

Ludwig: Prices will drop when tariff drops off

Patriotic ‘duty’: Will the U.S. presidential election affect the tariff on Chinese tires?

Latest in Consumer Tires